Resigned MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) throughout a poker competition last week.
Jose Canseco was the central figure in a weekend for the poker world that was filled with fingers: some lost, some pointed at prominent names into the poker community. In Canseco’s case, he appears to have lost the same hand for the 2nd time in of a month, something that few people (with any luck) will ever get to experience.
In belated October, Canseco ended up being in the news for accidentally shooting himself in the hand. Based on Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleansing his weapon in their kitchen. He finished up shooting his hand, which then had to be surgically reattached. It seems some surgeons are more skilled than others at digital fixes, however.
Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament
According to a tweet sent out by Canseco on however, the finger became detached again while he was playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening friday.
‘ I became playing in a poker competition final night and my finger fell of,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘Someone took a video from it.’
Thankfully, Canseco didn’t post that video, though there clearly was at least one supposed image of his finger before it fell off. As gruesome while the incident may however sound, Canseco said that this outcome might have been inescapable from the time he shot himself.
‘My hand must have been amputated right from the start,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘It was extremely loose with no bone tissue to connect it. It was additionally smelling actually bad.’
There was no word on whether or not Canseco won the hand to make up for losing the little finger. Formerly, Canseco’s fingers were best-known for gripping bats during their 17-year major league job as being a professional baseball player, during which he hit 462 house runs.
Colman Provides Hellmuth the Verbal Finger
Meanwhile, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly attached, of his or her own at 13-time World Series of Poker bracelet champion Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some harsh comments about Hellmuth in a thread in regards to the latter’s current appearance on a podcast hosted by Rounders author Brian Koppelman.
‘Its embarrassing that people need to share our profession with whores like this person,’ Colman wrote. ‘After we win one drop, he immediately comes on stage to shake my turn in front of the camera and congratulate me. Just as if he’s the gatekeeper to your poker world and welcoming me in.
‘It is truly pathetic that a 40 old would behave the way he does at the table, not to mention how spineless he is, just willing to take any sponsorship regardless of the company’s integrity,’ the $22 million winner waxed on year. ‘ Really makes me personally unfortunate to think there’s a chance some people may look up to this charlatan. People of their mindset and character really are a cancer to the world.’
Hellmuth was evidently astonished and hurt by the commentary, and responded briefly to them on Twitter.
‘Ouch, I was just assaulted time that is big a terrific poker forum,’ Hellmuth tweeted. ‘It was personal and it hurts, but I am proud regarding the man I will be!’
For their part, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was too harsh, and chose to back down the tone of his post, even if he stood behind the message.
‘we admit to being too harsh in my initial post. Phil didn’t deserve that hateful of the message,’ Colman later wrote. ‘Having said that, I still stand by the main gist of my post. Phil’s behavior in poker is atrocious, and I don’t think it belongs in this game.’
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver claims that US legal sports gambling is regulated in america. (Image: USATSI)
Can appropriate US recreations betting, across the board, be a thing ever? a proponent that is surprising emerged in the proper execution of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.
Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The nyc Times recently, stating that he thinks it is time to allow sports gambling to legally take place through the United States. That stance is in opposition compared to that of most major activities organizations in the united states, including the previously held place by the NBA and its former commissioner, David Stern.
‘Betting on professional activities happens to be illegal in all of the usa outside of Nevada,’ Silver said from the beginning of his opinion piece. ‘we believe we need a different sort of approach.’
Currently Illegal generally in most States
Silver went on slot machine called quick hits to describe the state that is current of gambling in america.
In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that already had some type of the betting available. Nevada could be the state that is only complete recreations betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon likewise have the proper to offer more restricted forms of sports-based gambling.
As Silver states, the NBA, and also other activities leagues and organizations in the usa, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing activities betting for decades. But which hasn’t stopped people from gambling on the games, no matter what the lack of the appropriate, regulated option.
‘But despite appropriate restrictions, sports wagering is extensive,’ Silver wrote. ‘It is a thriving underground business that runs free of regulation or oversight. Because there are few legal possibilities, those who want to bet resort to bookmaking that is illicit and shady offshore internet sites.’
In accordance with Silver, some estimates place the volume of illegal activities gambling into the united states of america at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per year. That dwarfs the amount of legal activities betting that takes place in Las vegas, nevada gambling enterprises and other locations in Nevada.
Trends Aim Towards Regulation
In the piece, Silver writes about the ‘domestic and trends that are global towards regulation of recreations betting. He points out that a lot of states now offer at least some kind of legal gambling, and that online gambling has already been regulated in three states. Because of this, he says, it’s time for Congress to enact brand new rules to replace PASPA.
‘Congress should adopt a federal framework that allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, topic to strict regulatory requirements and technological safeguards,’ he wrote.
Silver has previously made commentary suggesting he would be thinking about seeing regulated sports wagering in the United States, though this is the time that is first has organized his position in full. Other sports leagues declined to touch upon Silver’s stance.
Cuban Backs Silver’s Stance
However, at least one NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told CBSsports.com that ‘Adam has it exactly appropriate.’
‘In the past for PR reasons, we have put up resistance that is token them,’ Cuban said. ‘I trust Adam that now is the time to take sports betting out of the shadows and deal it is. with it like the huge business’
Despite Silver’s reviews, however, New Jersey shouldn’t expect the NBA to take out of the lawsuit that is aiming to stop the continuing state from allowing recreations betting to carry on at its gambling enterprises and racetracks.
‘Without a comprehensive federal solution, state measures such as New Jersey’s recent initiative are going to be both unlawful and bad public policy,’ Silver wrote.
Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson On-line Poker Ban Plan
Ron Paul laid out their arguments against an online gambling ban that is highly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)
Ron Paul has used his column that is weekly for Ron Paul Institute to argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of Us americans and could be taken up limited to the main benefit of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.
The former Republican Representative from Texas called such legislation an example of ‘cronyism,’ one thing he claims that most Americans are against no matter their political ideologies.
‘For instance, Congress may soon vote on legislation Internet that is outlawing gambling’ Paul penned.
‘It is a secret that is open at least within the Beltway, that this legislation is being considered as an opt to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, whom is perhaps best known for using his enormous wealth to advance a pro-war international policy, is now using his governmental impact to turn their online rivals into crooks.’
Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March
Paul’s words make reference to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that had been introduced by Republicans both in homes of Congress in March, and it has since picked up little but notable levels of bipartisan help in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw many forms of online gambling at the federal degree, really changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just activities betting, because it happens to be interpreted.
Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the reasons that are various for supporting the ban in an effort to show that it was really just being considered in the interests of Adelson.
‘Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are inspired by way of a desire to curry benefit with a donor that is wealthy’ Paul wrote. ‘ Instead, they give a true number of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some declare that legalizing online gambling will even enrich criminals and terrorists! But criminalizing online gambling enterprises will not eliminate the need for online casinos. Rather, passage of this legislation will likely guarantee that the online gambling marketplace is controlled by criminals.’
Paul Criticizes States’ Rights Argument
One of the major (and to many, perplexing) arguments used by supporters of RAWA is the fact that such a ban would really protect states’ rights. Paul explained their argument before laying away their thinking for why it was faulty.
‘Their argument is citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get those laws around by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,’ Paul claimed. ‘ Regardless if the argument had merit that permitting states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it will never justify legislation that is federal the issue…arguing that ‘states liberties’ justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which had been intended to limit federal power, on its mind.’
Paul organized several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing his opposition to a gambling ban that is online.
‘The proposed ban on Internet gambling is a blatantly unconstitutional infringement on our liberties that will probably expand the surveillance state,’ he concluded. ‘Worst of all, it is all being done for the benefit of one powerful billionaire.’
RAWA is unlikely to receive a hearing or see much movement in Congress throughout the current lame duck session. However, its prospects could improve within the Congress that is next Republicans will have majorities both in the home and Senate.